The general assembly of United States adopted the political declaration and global program of action in 1990 in its worldwide drive against money laundering and also enjoined upon member states to adopt legislation and program against laundering on a national level. India enacted the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. (Hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’). The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 has come into effect from 1st July, 2005. Necessary Notifications / Rules under the said Act have been published in the Gazette of India on 1st July, 2005 by the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, and Government of India.

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as SEBI) vide its Circular Ref No.: ISD/CIR/RR/AML/1/06 dated January 18, 2006 laid down broad guidelines on Anti Money Laundering Standards. As per the Circular, all the intermediaries registered with SEBI under Section 12 of the SEBI Act were advised to ensure that a proper policy framework on anti-money laundering measures was put in place. This was essentially in conformity with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and the Rules framed there under by SEBI.

In the light of Circulars issued by National Stock Exchange of India Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “NSE”) and Circulars issued by Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “BSE”), in continuation to the new circular of Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as “SEBI”) SEBI Circular No. ISD/AML/CIR-1/2009 dated September 01, 2009 has issued additional requirements to be fulfilled and clarifications with regard to existing requirements mentioned in the Master Circular on Anti Money Laundering (AML) issued vide SEBI circular no. ISD/AML/CIR-1/2008 dated December 19, 2008.

Money Laundering in India

With the growing financial sector, India is vulnerable to money laundering activities. Some common sources of illegal proceeds in India are narcotics trafficking, illegal trade in gems, smuggling, corruption and income tax evasion. Large portions of illegal proceeds are laundered through the alternative remittance system called “hawala”. Under this system, individuals transfer funds from once country to another or from one state to another, often without the actual movement of currency.

Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002

To combat money-laundering activities, the Government of India enacted the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) on January 17, 2003 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002

The basic objective of the Act is three fold, viz :
To prevent, combat and control money laundering. To confiscate and seize the property obtained from the laundered money. To deal with any other issue connected with money laundering in India.

Our Prevention Of Money Laundering Policy

The purpose of this policy is to set out the prevention of money laundering commitments and obligations for Leader Care Finance (hereinafter referred to as ‘Company’). This policy is based on the provision of the “Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and circular issued by SEBI and exchanges thereof”. This internal policy sets out and establishes governing principles, broad guidelines and standards to be adopted by the Companies in order to protect the Companies from being used by any person to launder money. Policy objectives : To protect the Company from being used for money laundering To follow thorough “Know Your Customer” (KYC) policies and procedures in the day-to-day business. To take appropriate action, once suspicious activities is detected, and make report to designated authorities in accordance with applicable law / laid down procedures. To comply with applicable laws as well as norms adopted internationally with reference to Money Laundering.

Integration- Placing the laundered proceeds back into the economy in such a way that they re-enter the financial system as apparently legitimate funds. Integration means the reinvestment of those funds in an apparently legitimate business so that no suspicion of its origin remains and to give the appearance of legitimizing the proceeds.

Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 defines the offences or laundering. In terms, of this section whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime and projecting it as untainted property shall be guilty of an offence of money laundering.

The term proceeds of crime have been defined under Section 2(u)of the Act viz :

“Any property derived or obtained, directly or indirectly, by any person as a result of criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence or the value of any such property.” The said section broadly states that if a person is involved in the process of projecting proceeds of crime as untainted property then he shall be guilty of money laundering, for indulging in the said process of the following three elements / activities shall play a very important role.

Possession or ownership of the proceeds of crime or property acquired from proceeds of crime, which is being reflected as untainted property. Transactions relating to proceeds of crime like converting its form. Concealment of the original transaction and/or creating ghost transactions from concealing actual transactions. E.g. Possessing Benami Property, Unexplained cash credits, unexplained expenditure, bogus or fictitious accounts, unexplained investments.


The Prevention of Money Laundering Policy applies to Leader Care Finance. In terms of rules framed under the Act, inter aila, every intermediary shall

Maintain a record of all transactions, the nature and value of which may be prescribed, whether such transactions comprise of single transaction or a series of transactions integrally connected to each other, and where such series of transactions take place within a month. Furnish information of transactions referred to in Clause (a) to the Director withinsuch time as may be prescribed. Verify and maintain the records of the identity of all its Clients, in such a manner as may be prescribed As per provision of section 2(n) of the Act, term “Intermediary” means: “ A stock-broker, sub-broker, share transfer agent, banker to an issue, trustee to a trust deed, registrar to an issue, merchant banker, underwriter, portfolio manager, investment adviser and any other intermediary associated with securities market and registered under section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992).

Further in terms of rules made under the Act, all intermediaries shall maintain a record of:

All cash transactions of the value of more than rupees ten lakhs or its equivalent in foreign currency. All series of cash transactions integrally connected to each other which have been valued below rupees ten lakhs or its equivalent in foreign currency where such series of transactions have taken place within a month All cash transaction where forged or counterfeit currency notes or bank notes have been used as genuine and where any forgery of a valuable security has taken place. All suspicious transactions whether or not mage in cash. Identity and current address or addresses including permanent address or addresses of the Client, the nature of business of the Client and his financial status; Provided that where it is not possible to verify the identity of the Client at the time of opening an account or executing any transaction, the banking company, financial institution and intermediary, as the case may be, shall verify the identity of the Client within a reasonable time after the account has been opened or the transaction has been executed.

Under these circumstances the Act, applies to Leader Care Finance.

Suspicious Transactions

Suspicious transactions involve funds derived from illegal activities or is intended or conducted in order to hide or disguise funds or assets derived from illegal activities (including, without limitation, the ownership, nature, source, location, or control of such funds or assets) as part of a plan to violate or evade any law or regulation or to avoid any transaction reporting requirement under the law; The transaction has no business or apparent lawful purpose or is not the sort in which the particular customer would normally be expected to engage, and the financial institution knows of no reasonable explanation for the transaction after examining the available facts, including the background and possible purpose of the transaction.

Criteria in relation to defining

It is difficult to define exactly what constitutes suspicious transactions and as such given below is a list of circumstances where transactions may be considered to be suspicious in nature. This list is only inclusive and not exhaustive. Whether a particular transaction is actually suspicious or not will depend on the background, details of the transactions and other facts and circumstances.

Complex /unusually large transactions/ patterns which appear to have no economic purpose. Client having suspicious background or links with known criminals. Clients whose identity verification seems difficult. False identification documents. Identification documents which could not be verified within reasonable time. Non face to face Client. Doubt over the real beneficiary of the account. Accounts opened with names very close to other established business entities. Client appears not to co-operate. Use of different accounts by Client alternatively. Sudden activity in dormant accounts. Multiple accounts. Large number of account having a common account holder, authorized signatory with no rationale. Unexplained transfers between multiple accounts with no rationale. Asset management services for clients where the sources of funds is not clear or not in keeping with the clients’ apparent standing/business activity. Substantial increase in business without apparent cause (Unusual activity compared to past transactions). Activity materially inconsistent with what would be expected from declared business. Inconsistency with clients apparent financial standing. Any account used for circular trading. Unusual transactions by Clients of Special Category (CSCs) and business undertaken by shell corporations, offshore banks/financial services, businesses reported to be in the nature of export-import of small items. A transaction which gives rise to a reasonable ground of suspicion that it may involve the proceeds of crime. A transaction which appears to be a case of insider trading. Transactions reflect likely market manipulations. Suspicious off market transactions Value of transaction just under the reporting threshold amount in an apparent attempt to avoid reporting. Inconsistency in the payment pattern by the client. Trading activity in account of high risk clients based on their profile, business pattern and industry segment. Accounts based as ‘passed through’. Where no transfer of ownership of securities or trading is occurred in the account and the account is being used only for funds transfers / layering purposes. Large deals at prices away from the market. Suspicious off market transactions. Purchases made in one client’s account and later on transferred to a third party through off market transactions through DP Accounts. Multiple transactions of value just below the threshold limit specified in PMLA so as to avoid possible reporting.

Implementation of the above requirements for our activities, The Company is into the following activities:

Retail Broking

We are following KYC norms before enlisting clients. We are also ensuring that all trades are settled through the banking channels and that all shares are electronically transferred to the beneficial owner through settlement systems of the exchanges. However, in order to ensure monitoring of large transactions, a report on all the Clients whose trade turnovers in Cash Market Segment are above Rs.10 lakh per month are reported on monthly basis by Compliance Department to the Principal Officer of the Company. The Compliance department would examine the patterns to determine whether there is a prima facie evidence of money laundering activity and ask concerned departments to call for any information that may be deemed necessary. The back office would provide the data to the Compliance department on monthly basis by 1st of the following month. The Compliance Department of the Company will prepare the report on the same and submit to the Principal Officer of the Company under PMLA, 2002.

Funds Management

We manage funds of reputed individuals and corporates which are in turn invested in Bonds, Mutual funds, equities & derivatives through proper banking channels. There is no need for anti-money laundering policy.

HEAD OFFICE Leader Care A-507/8 Navratna Corporate Park, Ashok Vatika Bopal-Ambli Road, Ahmedabad-380058

Mutual Funds and securities investments are subject to market risks and there is no assurance or guarantee that the objective of the Scheme will be achieved. Past performance of the Sponsor/AMC/Fund or that of any scheme of the Fund does not indicate the future performance of the Schemes of the Fund. Please read the Key Information Memorandum and the Offer Document carefully before investing.

  • INSURANCE DISCLAIMER - Insurance is a subject matter of solicitation
  • ARN Number - 11439
  • IRDAI Licence Number - AGQ0127782

Copyright © 2019Leader CareAll rights reserved

Designed, Developed & Content Powered by Accord Fintech Pvt. Ltd.